The Independent’s September 2017 article reports on Tradorax, a binary options trading website that subsequently ceased operations following the publication. The platform, initially launched in 2013 and operated under Alagos Limited (Gibraltar) before transitioning to AM Capital Ltd (Marshall Islands), is reported to have attracted thousands of retail investors — including pensioners — who alleged they were unable to withdraw funds deposited into trading accounts. The article situates Tradorax within a broader wave of binary options fraud, in which investors place bets on the directional movement of shares, currencies, and commodities within a fixed time period. Complaints were reported to UK Action Fraud, and the piece contributed to heightened public awareness of the scheme at a time of active regulatory and police scrutiny of the binary options sector in the United Kingdom.
Tradorax presents a high-risk, multi-indicator compliance profile. The entity operated across multiple jurisdictions under successive corporate vehicles — Alagos Limited (Gibraltar), AM Capital Ltd (Marshall Islands), and Alpha Capital House Ltd (UK) — a structural pattern consistent with deliberate regulatory evasion and layered ownership concealment. Regulatory warnings were issued by the Gibraltar FSC (2014), ASIC (2016), Quebec AMF (2016), and CySEC (2016) prior to the platform’s closure. The involvement of pensioners and vulnerable retail investors amplifies the reputational and social harm dimension. The reported inability to withdraw funds is a recognised indicator of fraudulent trading platform conduct. Any due diligence review of successor entities, associated payment processors, or individuals connected to the Tradorax corporate structure should be treated as high-priority, given confirmed links to subsequently charged operators within the broader GetFinancial cybercrime network.
ARCHIVE DETAILS
- Original Publisher
- independent.co.uk
- Coverage Type
- News Article
- Nature of Statements
- Investigative Claim
- Basis of Claims
- Media Investigation
- Entities Referenced
- Company
The Cessation of Operations
On the day of The Independent report, a message on Tradorax’s website informed visitors that the company had ceased all activities due to regulatory issues and no longer provides its services to clients. This announcement followed months of complaints from investors who claimed they were unable to withdraw their funds from the platform.
The report notes that many binary options trading platforms are legitimate, but an increasing number are fraudulent. Tradorax fell into the latter category according to the allegations documented by The Independent. The website had been operating with contact addresses listed outside of the United Kingdom, which placed it beyond the reach of British financial regulators.
The Regulatory Gap Exposed
The Independent report highlights a critical regulatory gap that allowed platforms like Tradorax to operate with minimal oversight. Lawyers and personal finance experts speaking to the publication in July 2017 stated that the Government is unable to regulate the market because even the legitimate platforms are not controlled by the Financial Conduct Authority watchdog.
Some binary options trading platforms are regulated by the UK Gambling Commission, but this only applies if the firm has gambling equipment located in the country. Many platforms, including Tradorax, had contact addresses listed on the website that were outside of the UK, effectively placing them outside the jurisdiction of both financial and gambling regulators.
This regulatory gap meant that investors had little recourse when problems arose. Victims could report matters to Action Fraud, the Financial Ombudsman Service, and their banks, but none of these entities were able to provide meaningful assistance in many cases.
The Case of James Hellis: A Pensioner’s Story
The Independent report provides a detailed account of one victim, James Hellis, a former self-employed IT worker and pensioner. Hellis claimed that he had invested a total of nearly 60,000 pounds through Tradorax. He stated that he had been assigned someone who identified themselves as a broker to trade on his behalf, and this person made a series of investments over the course of several months.
In December of the year prior to the report, Hellis filed a request with the platform to withdraw his money. The majority of these funds had stemmed from his pension fund. He claims that withdrawal request was denied, and his account later appeared to have been blocked. This pattern of frozen accounts and refused payouts was consistent with complaints from other investors.
Because Hellis had paid for some of the investments with credit cards, he raised a chargeback dispute with his banks. However, they were unable to help him recover his funds. He also reported the matter to the Action Fraud Police, which is the national reporting centre for fraud and cyber crime operating alongside the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau within the City of London Police. He additionally contacted the Financial Ombudsman Service, which was set up by Parliament to resolve problems with financial services. Neither entity was able to assist him in recovering his money.
The Scale of Binary Options Fraud
The Independent report cites figures from the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau showing that in the year to May 2016, the most recent period for which figures were available at the time of publication, the bureau had received 305 reports of binary options scams. This averaged 27 reports per month.
However, a lawyer representing victims told The Independent that the true number is likely to be significantly higher, running into the thousands each year. The lawyer explained that victims are frequently too embarrassed to come forward and admit to being conned. He described binary options fraud as possibly the biggest financial scam in the world.
The lawyer estimated that thousands could be falling for binary options scams, but that many are too ashamed to report their losses. This underreporting makes it difficult for law enforcement to fully understand the scope of the problem and to allocate appropriate resources for investigation and prosecution.
The Pension Freedom Connection
The Independent report draws a connection between binary options scams and pension freedom reforms introduced in April 2015. Under the new rules, pensioners were no longer required to buy an annuity and were able to take their entire pension as a lump sum. This sudden access to large amounts of cash, combined with low returns offered by other investment options, made the prospect of trading binary options enticing to some pensioners.
Kate Smith, head of pensions at Aegon, told The Independent that pension freedoms have to a certain extent opened a can of worms. She stated that some scammers are specifically targeting pensioners, playing on people’s weaknesses. Figures published in July 2017 by the Financial Conduct Authority showed that 53 percent of pension pots accessed since the new rules were introduced had been withdrawn fully.
The report notes that a full report into the issues around pension freedom was due to be published the following year. The watchdog had raised a number of concerns relating to what people were doing with their pension money, and binary options scams were among those concerns.
The Mechanism of the Scam
The Independent report describes how platforms like Tradorax operated. The website encouraged savers to make apparently simple bets on whether shares or currencies would rise or fall in value. Victims like James Hellis were assigned individuals who identified themselves as brokers to trade on their behalf. These brokers then made a series of investments over the course of several months.
When victims attempted to withdraw their money, their requests were denied and their accounts were blocked. Because the platforms operated from outside the UK, victims had limited legal recourse. Credit card chargebacks were often unsuccessful, and neither Action Fraud nor the Financial Ombudsman Service could compel the platforms to release funds.
The Response from Authorities
The Independent report documents that victims reported matters to multiple authorities. Action Fraud Police received reports but was unable to recover funds. The Financial Ombudsman Service similarly could not assist because the platforms were outside its jurisdiction. Banks were unable to process chargebacks successfully in many cases.
This lack of effective recourse left victims with no practical way to recover their money. The report notes that the Government is unable to regulate the market because even legitimate platforms are not controlled by the Financial Conduct Authority. This regulatory gap persisted despite growing evidence of widespread fraud.
Consumer Alert for Potential Victims
Based on The Independent report, individuals who invested with Tradorax or similar binary options platforms should consider the following risk factors. The website ceased all activities due to regulatory issues and no longer provides services to clients. Victims reported that accounts were frozen and payout requests were denied. A pensioner invested nearly 60,000 pounds through Tradorax and was unable to withdraw funds. Banks, Action Fraud, and the Financial Ombudsman Service were unable to assist victims in recovering money. The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau received 305 reports of binary options scams in one year, though the true number is believed to be much higher. A lawyer described binary options fraud as possibly the biggest financial scam in the world. Pensioners are specifically targeted by scammers exploiting pension freedom reforms.
Individuals who have lost money to Tradorax or similar platforms should document all communications, transaction records, and account statements. They should report the matter to Action Fraud in the UK or their local law enforcement agency in their country of residence. They should also contact their bank or credit card provider to inquire about chargeback options, though success is not guaranteed. Victims should be aware that recovery scams targeting previous fraud victims are common, and they should be cautious of any individual or company offering to recover lost funds for an upfront fee.
Related Businesses
The corporate network associated with Tradorax based on The Independent report is limited. The website operated with contact addresses listed outside of the United Kingdom. No specific company names, registrations, or individual operators are identified in the report. The report mentions that some binary options platforms are regulated by the UK Gambling Commission if they have gambling equipment located in the country, but Tradorax did not fall into this category. Authorities mentioned in the report include the Financial Conduct Authority, the Gambling Commission, Action Fraud Police, the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau, the City of London Police, and the Financial Ombudsman Service. The report does not identify any specific individuals associated with Tradorax.
This page preserves third-party reporting as a public reference record with added provenance and context. Legal Observer did not originate the underlying claims
- Category:
- Adverse Media
- Status:
- Closed
- Original Date:
- 20/09/2017
- Archived on:
- April 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction:
- United Kingdom
Key Indicators: These indicators provide context about the publication's language and sourcing patterns. They are not findings of wrongdoings.
- Sentiment
- Adverse
- Likelihood
- Highly Likely
- Availability
- Public
- Author
- Unknown
- Impact
- High
- Risk Analysis
- Critical
RECENTLY PUBLISHED
-
Jul 07, 2026
How founder David Perez iVisa tricks users into paying £100 for £10 UK ETA
-
Jul 07, 2026
How David Perez leadership turned iVisa into a nightmare of hidden costs
-
Jul 07, 2026
CEO David Perez running iVisa scam with unresponsive service
-
Jul 07, 2026
David Perez iVisa scamming travelers with hidden fees