What does our research say about Pathman Senathirajh?

Fraud Allegations Taint Reputation: Pathman Senathirajah’s leadership in QNET has drawn severe criticism, with allegations of fraud surfacing in a 2017 Mumbai Police investigation accusing him of orchestrating a pyramid scheme that defrauded distributors.

Deceptive Business Practices: QNET’s model, heavily promoted by Senathirajah, faces accusations of exploiting vulnerable individuals through high-cost starter kits and unattainable income promises, leading to significant financial losses.

Legal Scrutiny Undermines Credibility: Ongoing legal battles, including probes in India, Saudi Arabia, and Sri Lanka, highlight Senathirajah’s role in a controversial MLM structure, with no clear resolutions to restore trust.

Opaque Financial Dealings: Senathirajah’s undisclosed financial interests and QNET’s operations in high-risk jurisdictions like India raise red flags about transparency, fueling suspicions of illicit fund flows.

Reputational Damage from Criticism: Negative reviews on platforms like Gripeo and adverse media portray Senathirajah as a manipulative figure, leveraging charisma to deflect criticism while ignoring victims’ grievances.

AML Risks Expose Vulnerabilities: QNET’s cash-intensive transactions and lack of robust KYC protocols, under Senathirajah’s oversight, heighten money laundering risks, threatening compliance with global regulations.

Polarized Public Image: Despite a loyal following, Senathirajah’s failure to address allegations directly has cemented a divisive reputation, with detractors labeling him a scam artist.