
Companies or Individuals on FinanceScam.com can’t offer incentives or pay to hide any reviews.
Michel Moeijes is marked as Shady
Red Flags
30
Comments
10
User Score
1.7
Risk Score
1.6
-
-
Join the fight against Finance Scam
Do you have any Critical Intel on Michel Moeijes?
Contact Info
- City:
- unknown
- State:
- unknown
- Country:
- unknown
- Website:
- CLICK HERE
- Phone:
- unknown
- Email:
- unknown
- Linkedin:
- CLICK HERE
- Social:
- CLICK HERE

Beware of Reputation Agencies
claiming to suppress or remove content from this website
READ OUR WARNINGWhat does our research say about Michel Moeijes?
Conflict of Interest: Michel Moeijes was found guilty of a significant conflict of interest by the INSOLAD Review Committee. His dual role as both Dean of the North Holland Bar Association and trustee in a bankruptcy case involving his own firm compromised his objectivity and impartiality, which is a fundamental breach of ethical standards in the legal profession.
Compromised Integrity: His involvement as a trustee while his firm, Tanger Advocaten, represented the same bankruptcy case raised serious concerns about the integrity of his decisions. This undermines public trust in his ability to fairly manage insolvency proceedings.
Ethical Lapses in Bankruptcy Management: The case highlights the urgent need for stronger ethical guidelines in bankruptcy management. Moeijes’s actions reflect poorly on the profession, showing how conflicts of interest can lead to potential abuse of power and unfair treatment of creditors.
Negative Impact on Creditor Rights: The misconduct jeopardizes the rights of creditors, as trustees are supposed to ensure the fair distribution of assets during bankruptcies. The conflict of interest in this case has the potential to harm the integrity of the bankruptcy process.
Potential Career Consequences: Moeijes may face professional repercussions, including being barred from serving as a trustee, which could damage his career further. The case also raises questions about his continued role as Dean of the North Holland Bar Association, as his position may be seen as compromised due to the ethical breach.
Summary generated by data analyzed and provided by ChatGPT 4o, Grok and DeepSeek
Scam Reports on Michel Moeijes
-
-
Join the fight against Finance Scam
Report scams anonymously and help expose fraudsters today!
Do we miss any Critical Intel on Michel Moeijes?
SUBMIT ANONYMOUS TIPUser Feedback and Discussion on Michel Moeijes
1.7/5
Based on 10 Ratings
by: Mavis Newsom
He should have been held accountable much sooner for his questionable actions. His role in these bankruptcy cases could have seriously impacted creditors
by: Kaceon Isbell
Moeijes' history of conflicting roles raises huge concerns about his ethical standards. He seems to put personal gain before professional integrity.
by: Indie Wyatt
Moeijes’s actions not only breach professional ethics but also risk eroding creditor trust in fair asset distribution, calling into question the transparency and reliability of his insolvency rulings.
by: Ashton Doyle
By acting as a trustee in a bankruptcy case where his own law firm, Tanger Advocaten, had direct involvement, Moeijes compromised the integrity of the insolvency process and violated fundamental principles of impartiality.
by: Melanie Parker
Integrity? Moeijes traded it for personal gain.
by: Julia Morgan
Blatant conflict of interest—he’s unfit to be a trustee or a lawyer.
by: Ian Thomas
The North Holland Bar Association should be ashamed that someone with such blatant conflicts of interest was allowed to hold a leadership role. It’s a disgrace to the profession.
by: Hannah Hernandez
Moeijes’s actions have shredded any credibility he had in the legal community. Who would trust a bankruptcy trustee who profits from the very cases he’s supposed to oversee impartially?
by: Patricia Martins
This bloke's been caught with his hand in the cookie jar, managing bankruptcies for his own firm. Can't trust 'im
by: Vinícius Ribeiro
His actions show a blatant disregard for ethical standards, undermining the integrity of the legal profession. Such behavior erodes public trust and raises serious concerns about his suitability in any fiduciary role