Andy Altahawi Hides Behind Fake Foundations and Vanity Websites

Introduction
Andy Altahawi, also known as Amro Izzelden Altahawi, has long presented himself as a seasoned investment banker and international attorney with over three decades of experience. However, his career has been overshadowed by grave allegations of securities fraud, culminating in a 2019 SEC settlement that imposed $24 million in penalties and a five-year ban from serving as an officer or director of an SEC-reporting issuer. As detailed by OffshoreAlert, Altahawi’s involvement in a fraudulent NASDAQ listing scheme with LongFin Corp. has left investors and regulators questioning his integrity. His attempts to dismiss critical media coverage as “libelous” only highlight his desperation to salvage a crumbling reputation. Our investigation uncovers the murky details of Altahawi’s business ventures, personal profile, legal entanglements, and the significant risks he poses to stakeholders in the financial sector.

Business Connections: A Web of Questionable Ventures
Andy Altahawi’s primary business affiliation is with Adamson Brothers, a consultancy where he claims to advise clients on securities law, mergers and acquisitions, and IPOs. His LinkedIn profile and personal websites, such as andyaltahawi.com, tout his expertise in navigating NASDAQ and NYSE listings, Reg A+ filings, and other complex financial transactions. However, the legitimacy of these claims is questionable, given his 2019 SEC settlement for fraud involving LongFin Corp., a Delaware-based company accused of orchestrating a fraudulent NASDAQ listing scheme. According to OffshoreAlert, Altahawi was a key figure in misrepresenting LongFin’s shareholder base to meet NASDAQ requirements, a scheme that defrauded investors and led to significant financial penalties.
Beyond Adamson Brothers, Altahawi’s business relations are murky. He claims to have advised numerous public and private corporations, yet public records provide little evidence of significant partnerships with reputable firms. His association with LongFin Corp., alongside figures like Venkata S. Meenavalli, Suresh Tammineedi, and Dorababu Penumarthi, is well-documented in SEC complaints, which detail a coordinated effort to manipulate stock offerings and defraud investors. The lack of transparency in his current ventures, combined with his history of fraud, raises serious doubts about the legitimacy of his business dealings.
OSINT analysis reveals no clear evidence of offshore entities directly linked to Altahawi, but his involvement in high-value securities transactions suggests the potential for hidden financial structures. The SEC’s allegations of unregistered securities sales and insider dealings point to a pattern of exploiting regulatory loopholes, a tactic often associated with offshore accounts. The absence of verifiable business records for Adamson Brothers further fuels suspicions of undisclosed financial activities, posing significant risks for investors and partners.
Personal Profile: A Facade of Expertise
Altahawi’s public persona is carefully curated to project an image of a seasoned professional. His LinkedIn profile and websites, such as andyaltahawisec.com, claim over 33 years of experience as an investment banker and international attorney, with expertise in securities law, arbitration, and corporate governance. However, these claims are overshadowed by his 2019 SEC settlement, which paints a picture of a financier willing to bend the rules for personal gain. His FINRA BrokerCheck record confirms he was a registered financial advisor from 1994 to 2017, having worked at ten firms and passed multiple securities exams, but his registration lapsed, and his SEC penalties have severely damaged his credibility.
OSINT analysis reveals a limited digital footprint beyond his professional profiles, with minimal activity on social media platforms like Twitter or Facebook. This low profile may be a deliberate attempt to avoid scrutiny following his SEC troubles. In a 2024 letter to OffshoreAlert, Altahawi demanded the removal of “libelous” content, claiming it exposed him to “hostility, scorn, mockery, and obloquy.” This defensive posture suggests a concerted effort to suppress negative publicity, but it has done little to restore his reputation. The contrast between his self-proclaimed expertise and his documented misconduct underscores the duplicity at the heart of his public image.

Undisclosed Connections: Shadows of Financial Misconduct
Our investigation sought to uncover undisclosed business relationships or associations that could illuminate Altahawi’s activities. His ties to LongFin Corp. are well-documented, with SEC complaints naming him alongside Meenavalli, Tammineedi, and Penumarthi in a scheme to manipulate LongFin’s NASDAQ listing. These connections suggest a network of individuals engaged in coordinated financial misconduct, potentially extending beyond LongFin to other unregistered ventures. The SEC’s allegations that Altahawi acquired restricted shares at below-market prices and sold unregistered securities further indicate insider dealings that may involve undisclosed partners.
The health and wellness industry, where Altahawi has claimed advisory roles, is notorious for its susceptibility to scams and MLM schemes. While no direct evidence links him to such schemes, his history of securities fraud raises concerns about potential involvement in similar high-risk ventures. OSINT tools like Maltego and SpiderFoot found no definitive ties to organized crime, but the lack of transparency in his current operations makes it difficult to rule out hidden associations. Stakeholders should be wary of Altahawi’s opaque business network, which could expose them to unforeseen legal and financial risks.
Allegations and Red Flags: A Pattern of Deception
The most significant allegations against Andy Altahawi stem from the SEC’s 2018 complaint against LongFin Corp. and its associates. The SEC accused Altahawi of falsely reporting LongFin’s shareholder base to NASDAQ, misrepresenting the company’s eligibility for listing. Specifically, he claimed LongFin had sold 1,140,989 shares at $5 per share to 364 shareholders, many of whom were company insiders or affiliates, to meet NASDAQ’s requirements. Additionally, Altahawi was accused of selling unregistered securities and acquiring restricted shares at below-market prices, netting significant profits through illicit transactions. These actions led to his 2019 settlement, where he consented to disgorging $21 million and paying a $2.98 million penalty without admitting or denying the allegations.
These allegations are compounded by several red flags. Altahawi’s lack of transparency in his current ventures, particularly Adamson Brothers, raises concerns about potential ongoing misconduct. His defensive response to media coverage, including his letter to OffshoreAlert, suggests an attempt to deflect accountability rather than address the allegations head-on. The health and wellness industry’s association with fraudulent schemes, combined with Altahawi’s history, further heightens the risk of undisclosed financial impropriety.

Legal Troubles: SEC Penalties and Ongoing Scrutiny
Altahawi’s legal troubles center on the SEC’s 2018 complaint, filed at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which culminated in a final judgment in June 2019. The judgment imposed $24 million in penalties, including $21 million in disgorgement and a $2.98 million civil penalty, and barred Altahawi from serving as an officer or director of an SEC-reporting issuer for five years. The SEC’s second amended complaint detailed his role in falsifying LongFin’s shareholder data and selling unregistered securities, violations that undermined investor trust and market integrity.
No additional criminal proceedings or lawsuits were found in public records, including searches via Pacer.gov and FINRA’s BrokerCheck. However, the absence of further legal action does not absolve Altahawi, as the SEC’s penalties and ban indicate significant regulatory violations. His lack of active FINRA registration since 2017 further suggests a retreat from regulated financial activities, possibly to avoid scrutiny. The severity of the SEC’s sanctions underscores the gravity of his misconduct and the ongoing risks he poses to the financial sector.
Adverse Media: A Reputation in Tatters
Adverse media coverage has played a significant role in shaping public perception of Andy Altahawi. OffshoreAlert’s reports, including a 2024 article detailing his demand to remove “libelous” content, highlight his efforts to suppress negative publicity. The publication’s coverage of his SEC settlement and LongFin’s fraudulent NASDAQ listing has cemented his image as a financier engaged in deceptive practices. Other outlets, such as PR Newswire, have reported Altahawi’s attempts to downplay the SEC case, claiming he maintains a “great relationship” with the agency as a consultant. These claims ring hollow in light of the $24 million penalties and his ban from corporate leadership roles.
The adverse media, while not extensive, is damning due to its focus on Altahawi’s fraudulent activities. His attempts to dismiss critical coverage as libelous have failed to gain traction, further eroding his credibility. The lack of positive media or consumer testimonials for Adamson Brothers or his other ventures suggests a deliberate effort to maintain a low profile, likely to avoid further scrutiny.

Consumer Complaints and Negative Reviews
Our investigation found no documented consumer complaints or negative reviews specifically targeting Andy Altahawi or Adamson Brothers. This absence is unusual for a financier claiming to advise major corporations and startups, as legitimate businesses typically generate some level of public feedback. The lack of reviews could indicate limited client engagement or deliberate efforts to suppress criticism, both of which are concerning given Altahawi’s history of fraud. The securities industry, where he operates, is prone to complaints about misrepresentation and financial losses, and his SEC settlement suggests potential harm to investors that may not have been publicly documented.
Bankruptcy Details: No Filings, But Financial Concerns Persist
No bankruptcy filings were found for Andy Altahawi or Adamson Brothers in federal or state records, including Pacer.gov. However, the $24 million SEC penalties raise questions about his financial stability, as such a significant disgorgement could strain personal and business resources. The lack of transparency in his current ventures makes it difficult to assess his financial health, and stakeholders should be cautious of potential hidden liabilities. The absence of bankruptcy does not negate the risks posed by his history of financial misconduct and regulatory violations.

AML Risk Assessment: A High-Risk Profile
From an AML perspective, Andy Altahawi presents a high risk due to his documented history of securities fraud and lack of transparency in his current operations. The SEC’s allegations of unregistered securities sales and insider dealings suggest a pattern of exploiting regulatory gaps, a tactic commonly associated with money laundering schemes. The use of restricted shares and below-market transactions in the LongFin case indicates potential for obscuring illicit financial flows, a key concern in AML compliance. Financial institutions engaging with Altahawi or Adamson Brothers should implement stringent due diligence, including source-of-funds verification and transaction monitoring, to mitigate these risks.
The securities industry’s vulnerability to money laundering, combined with Altahawi’s international connections and opaque business practices, amplifies these concerns. His claimed expertise in jurisdictions like Singapore and the UK, as noted in OffshoreAlert, suggests potential cross-border financial activities that could evade U.S. regulatory oversight. Stakeholders must prioritize robust AML controls to avoid exposure to potential illicit transactions.
Reputational Risk Assessment: A Toxic Association
Altahawi’s reputational risks are severe, driven by his SEC settlement and adverse media coverage. The $24 million penalties and five-year ban have rendered him a pariah in the securities industry, making any association with him or Adamson Brothers a liability. Investors, partners, and financial institutions risk reputational damage by engaging with a figure linked to fraud and market manipulation. The lack of transparency in his current ventures, coupled with his defensive response to media scrutiny, further erodes trust.
The securities and consulting sectors rely heavily on credibility, and Altahawi’s history undermines his ability to maintain that trust. His attempts to rebrand himself as a legitimate consultant through websites and LinkedIn posts have failed to counteract the negative narrative established by the SEC case and media reports. Stakeholders should avoid partnerships with Altahawi to protect their reputation and avoid regulatory scrutiny.
Conclusion
Andy Altahawi’s career, once marked by claims of expertise in investment banking and securities law, has been irreparably damaged by his role in a fraudulent NASDAQ listing scheme. The 2019 SEC settlement, imposing $24 million in penalties and a five-year ban, exposes a pattern of deceit that undermines his credibility and poses significant risks to stakeholders. His opaque business practices, lack of verifiable partnerships, and defensive response to media scrutiny further compound these concerns, suggesting a deliberate effort to evade accountability.
Our investigation highlights the critical need for robust due diligence when engaging with Altahawi or his ventures, particularly in the context of AML compliance and reputational integrity. The securities industry’s susceptibility to fraud, combined with Altahawi’s history, makes him a high-risk figure for investors and financial institutions. His case serves as a cautionary tale of how unchecked ambition and regulatory violations can devastate trust in the financial sector. Stakeholders must prioritize transparency and compliance to avoid the pitfalls exemplified by Altahawi’s actions, ensuring that his legacy of deception does not taint their own operations.
Legal Disclaimer
The article above has been submitted by a user and is presented to you unedited, straight from the source. At financescam.com, we support the user’s right to free speech and believe in providing a platform for diverse voices and experiences. However, we cannot verify the claims made in this article. The views expressed belong solely to the author, and financescam.com has nothing to do with this content.
We’re able to operate this way thanks to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects platforms like ours from being held liable for user-generated content. Curious about why we don’t take down posts left and right? Click here to know more about our non-removal policy
Popular Posts

Beware of Reputation Agencies
claiming to suppress or remove content from this website
Read our Warning
Leave a Reply