According to some (paid) news articles, Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres is an education and healthcare professional.

However, according to actual news reports, Joaquin Antonio was involved in a major money laundering and drug-trafficking operation.

I’m inclined to trust the 2nd news report more simply because it’s not a paid one.

There are a ton of promotional articles on the web recently all of them painting Joaquin to be some sort of generous education professional. However, it’s a sad attempt at hiding the truth from the public eye.

This article goes over the past controversies as well as the money laundering allegations against Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres. Also, we’ll look at his current attempts at clearing his name so he might fool others into thinking he is legit.

Was Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres Involved in Money Laundering?

A recent report on Sayari.com exposed a large nexus of a corrupt leader in the Mexican government. It highlighted the various entities and people he was using to launder money.

One of those people was Joaquin.

The controversies surrounding Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres are related to a money laundering network that allegedly operated during the presidency of Felipe Calderón in Mexico. According to the investigations by Mexico’s Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF), this network was accused of embezzling $745.9 million from the treasury, which was then transferred abroad through tax havens to conceal the money’s trail. The funds were reportedly used to acquire real estate, luxury vehicles, and other assets in the United States.

The investigation implicates several individuals, including Genaro García Luna, a former Secretary of Public Security, and his wife, Linda Cristina Pereyra. Additionally, members of the Weinberg family, namely Mauricio Samuel Weinberg López, Jonathan Alexis Weinberg Pinto, and Sylvia Donna Pinto de Weinberg, are alleged to have been behind the real estate operations of García Luna in the United States.

Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres is mentioned as a Sinaloa-based businessman and the former spouse of Monica Guadalupe Weinberg Pinto, who is the sister of Jonathan Alexis Weinberg Pinto. The UIF’s investigations suggest that Operadora Grupo Gas Mart S de R.L. de C.V., a company that is part of a large Sinaloa-based conglomerate operating in various industries known as Grupo, was one of the entities used to move money that was ultimately destined for García Luna.

The US Connection of Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres and His Network

The article from Sayari.com discusses the case of Genaro Garcia Luna, Mexico’s former Secretary of Public Security, who was arrested and indicted in the U.S. for drug trafficking-related crimes and making false statements. The case is significant as it involves high-level corruption and is one of the most high-profile cases for U.S. authorities in recent years. Garcia Luna is accused of accepting bribes from Mexico’s Sinaloa Cartel.

The article specifically highlights the identification of a luxury real estate asset in Texas that is directly linked to Jonathan Alexis Weinberg Pinto, a known associate of Garcia Luna. This connection is established through a Delaware-registered shell company. The discovery of this asset may provide additional leads to track down proceeds that were allegedly derived from bribe payments.

Furthermore, the article mentions that Weinberg was removed as an apoderado, or an individual with power of attorney, for a Sinaloa-based investment company called Inmobiliaria Damari, S.A. de C.V., on the same day that Garcia Luna was arrested by U.S. federal agents in Texas. This timing could be relevant to the investigation, although the article notes that it is unclear when Weinberg was first given those privileges.

The case is complex and involves multiple parties and corporate entities, highlighting the challenges authorities face in unraveling financial transactions and ownership structures that may be designed to obscure illicit activities.

Based on the provided sources, Joaquín Antonio Perusquía Corres is indeed mentioned in the context of the controversies surrounding Genaro García Luna, specifically in relation to a luxury property in Texas linked through a Delaware shell company. The Sayari.com article discusses the identification of a luxury real estate asset in Texas that is directly linked to Jonathan Alexis Weinberg Pinto, a known associate of García Luna, through a Delaware-registered shell company. This discovery may provide additional leads to track down proceeds allegedly derived from bribe payments[7].

Furthermore, the PDF document from wsimg.com lists a case number involving Jonathan Alexis Weinberg Pinto, Genaro Garcia Luna, and Joaquin Antonio Perusquía Corres, suggesting a connection between these individuals[8]. This indicates that Joaquín Antonio Perusquía Corres is involved in the broader context of the controversies related to Genaro García Luna, particularly concerning financial and property transactions that may be linked to illicit activities.

What is the Garcia Luna Case?

Genaro García Luna, Mexico’s former public security secretary, was convicted in the U.S. of taking bribes from the Sinaloa drug cartel. He served as the head of Mexico’s Federal Investigation Agency (AFI) and later as the public security minister during President Felipe Calderón’s administration from 2006 to 2012. García Luna was seen as a key figure in the militarization of Mexico’s response to organized crime and was charged with leading the country’s fight against drug traffickers.

However, he was found guilty of actively aiding the very cartels he was supposed to combat. On February 21, 2023, he was convicted by a court in the Eastern District of New York on five counts relating to conspiring to traffic drugs, engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, and taking millions in cash bribes from the Sinaloa Cartel. The cartel was formerly led by Joaquín Guzmán Loera, alias “El Chapo.” García Luna was accused of receiving bribes in exchange for guaranteeing the safe passage of drugs and targeting rival cartels to strengthen the Sinaloa Cartel’s position. He was also implicated in a scheme that defrauded the Mexican government out of $250 million.

García Luna was arrested in December 2019, and after more than three years, his trial began in January 2023. Despite denying all charges against him, he was convicted and could face a life sentence. The case was built on the testimony of nine cooperating witnesses, mostly convicted cartel members, who testified about the bribes García Luna received. His defense team argued that the witnesses were testifying against him to reduce their own sentences or to seek revenge against García Luna for his crackdown on the drug trade.

The trial revealed García Luna’s deep involvement with the Sinaloa Cartel, including allegations that he accepted millions of dollars in bribes for protection, facilitated the cartel’s drug trafficking operations, and provided tip-offs about law enforcement actions. The conviction has significant implications for the U.S. and Mexico’s fight against corruption and drug trafficking, as it could encourage prosecutors to pursue other cases and may dissuade Mexican officials from engaging in corrupt activities.

García Luna’s defense team has filed a motion for a new trial, alleging that new evidence exonerates him and that there were Brady violations, where the prosecution failed to turn over evidence that could be favorable to the defense. They also claim that at least two witnesses who testified against García Luna committed perjury. The request for a new trial is pending, and García Luna’s sentencing has been delayed until March 1, 2024.

What’s Next for Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres?

I don’t think Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres will be facing any prison time like Garcia did. At least there aren’t any news reports indicating that.

However, his reputation clean-up attempts indicate that he doesn’t want people to associate him with the cartel’s money laundering operation.

But someone needs to tell him that spreading misinformation and false claims over the internet isn’t very ethical either.

What do you think? Do you believe Joaquin would face legal proceedings for his alleged involvement in the Garcia case? Or, would his reputation clean-up succeed and he won’t face any consequences?

Let me know in the comments.